
2026
The future of architecture: an insider's take on AI
How rapid layouts, constraint management, and accessible design are reshaping the industry.

Caroline Boulard
Head of Growth
The home design process is changing faster than most people realize. AI can now juggle 100+ constraints in real time, generate multiple layout options in minutes, and flag budget or zoning conflicts before they become expensive mistakes. But the technology isn't replacing architects. It's reshaping what the process looks like, who it serves, and what architects actually spend their time on. We sat down with Stéphane Turbide, co-founder and COO at Maket, who brings years of experience in the architecture industry, to understand what home design looks like now and where it's heading.
Introduction
Most people have never seen the real process of designing a home. They imagine an architect sketching something brilliant on a napkin. The reality involves months of back and forth, dozens of overlapping constraints, and a lot of waiting. That process is being fundamentally reshaped by AI in building design.
We interviewed Stéphane Turbide, co-founder and COO of Maket, who spent years working in the architecture industry before co-founding the company. He's been on both sides: designing homes the traditional way and building AI tools that are transforming how it's done. His perspective covers the full picture, from how plans get made to who architecture is really for.
AI is real, and it works
The first thing Stéphane Turbide wants architects to hear is simple.
"AI is real and it works. Three years ago I wouldn't have said that, but today it genuinely adds value. It can't change everything completely, but it clearly accelerates high-value tasks."— Stéphane Turbide, Co-founder & COO, Maket
That clarity matters because the conversation around AI in architecture is often dominated by extremes (including whether tools like ChatGPT can be used for architecture). Some professionals dismiss it entirely. Others overpromise. The reality is somewhere in between: AI is a powerful accelerator for specific parts of the process, not a magic replacement for professional judgment.
The CAD lesson architects already lived through
When architects push back on AI, Stéphane brings them back to a transition they already survived: the shift from pencil and paper to CAD in the 2000s.
"People thought CAD would completely change how we design homes, but it just accelerated things. AI is the same. It doesn't destroy or completely change how we work, but it lets us do much more and orient the process toward the client rather than profitability."— Stéphane Turbide
The parallel is useful because it reframes what AI actually threatens (and what it doesn't). CAD didn't eliminate architects. It made drafting faster, which freed up time for design thinking and client work. AI is doing the same thing, just at a much larger scale.
How AI changes the design process
Managing 100 constraints at once
One of the most underappreciated capabilities of AI in architecture is constraint management. A residential project involves dozens of overlapping requirements: budget, client preferences, municipal regulations, provincial and federal codes, construction constraints, site limitations, and more.
"AI can hold about 100 constraints simultaneously: budget, client preferences, municipal, provincial and federal regulations, technical construction constraints. When I change something, it flags what's no longer within the agreed parameters."— Stéphane Turbide
In traditional practice, keeping track of all these constraints is a manual, error-prone process. An architect reviews a change, mentally checks it against the relevant rules, and sometimes misses a conflict that only surfaces weeks later (often at a much higher cost to fix).
Two concrete examples illustrate this. First, budget: if a client asks about adding a garage, AI can immediately flag the cost impact (typically $30,000 to $50,000) and show what changes downstream if the garage is added or removed. Second, site constraints: if a client gets excited about extending the façade during a design session, AI flags that the setback margin would be exceeded, even in the middle of a fast moving conversation. No one has to remember the rule. The system catches it.
Exploring more options, faster
The traditional process forces a bottleneck in exploration. A client arrives with Pinterest folders, inspiration images, a list of needs (bedrooms, bathrooms, views), and municipal regulations. Without AI, the architect takes all of that away, analyzes it, and comes back for a second meeting with a first sketch: basic block diagrams showing room placement and circulation.
With an AI floor plan generator, that entire exploration phase can happen during the first meeting.
"With AI, I can process all those constraints in real time during the first meeting and generate multiple block diagrams in minutes, rather than presenting just one option."— Stéphane Turbide
This changes more than speed. It changes the quality of the conversation. Instead of proposing one layout and hoping it lands, the architect can show several directions and explain why certain approaches won't work. That transparency matters because clients often feel their needs aren't being considered when options are rejected without explanation.
What makes a floor plan actually good
AI can generate layouts quickly, but what separates a functional plan from a great one? According to Stéphane, the answer is less technical than most people think.
"When someone walks into a home and says 'wow, it's beautiful here,' that's hard to explain, but it's almost always tied to circulation and the emotions the space creates."— Stéphane Turbide
A good plan uses the least space possible while being optimally organized: less impressive rooms tucked away efficiently, more impressive spaces front and center. In Québec specifically, people love gathering around a kitchen island, open concept living, and views. Orienting the kitchen so you can see the front door when guests arrive is a deliberate emotional design choice, not just a layout preference.
This is exactly where AI has made the most progress, and Stéphane has watched it happen firsthand.
From blocks on a screen to real architecture
Stéphane was there when Maket produced one of the first AI-generated architectural plans. His initial reaction was purely technical.
"It was impressive that it could understand constraints and generate something, but it was placing blocks just to place them, without asking whether it was beautiful or functional."— Stéphane Turbide
That was the starting point. Since then, the leap has been dramatic. AI-generated plans now look like professional architectural drawings with correct nomenclature (doors, windows, walls), and the system understands circulation and spatial emotion, not just proximity between rooms. It went from solving a puzzle to designing an experience.
The budget problem no one talks about
One of the most common issues Stéphane encounters isn't technical at all. It's the gap between what homeowners imagine and what they can afford.
"Their vision is almost always bigger than their budget, often double. They see things on Pinterest or Instagram that look great and want to reproduce them, but the more detailed you get, the more expensive it becomes."— Stéphane Turbide
AI helps here in a way that traditional processes can't. Because generating and modifying layouts is fast, the architect can walk a client through realistic alternatives in real time. "You want three bedrooms? Let's rethink what that actually means for your family's daily routine." Sometimes the best design solution isn't giving the client exactly what they asked for. It's reframing the question entirely.
This extends to the broader housing crisis. Architect fees are actually a small fraction of total project costs (typically $3,000 to $4,000 on a $600,000 build). The real cost drivers are construction materials, land scarcity, and slow permitting processes. AI's biggest potential impact isn't reducing architect fees. It's streamlining the full process so each step communicates with the next, reducing delays and waste across the board.
Where architects fit in the future
With AI handling more of the process, the natural question is what's left for architects. Stéphane's answer is more optimistic than you'd expect.
"AI will probably handle 60 to 80% of the process, which would be wonderful. The last 20%, for what is the biggest investment of most people's lives, you'd still want a human to confirm you've made the right choices."— Stéphane Turbide
But the picture is more nuanced than a simple percentage. Stéphane sees two tiers of architecture emerging.
The first tier is accessible architecture: a young couple building a home simply to have a roof over their heads. In that context, an architect doesn't add enormous value. That's where architectural technologists and AI tools come in, making decent design available without the cost of a full architectural engagement.
The second tier is what he calls "architect's homes": projects where someone genuinely wants a well-thought-out design, deeply connected to the site and their lifestyle. In that space, the architect's value is irreplaceable.
"What I'd love is for all architects to move toward that second tier, using AI to bring their fees down from $40,000 to $50,000 to $2,000 to $4,000 while still delivering that quality. AI won't replace the architect there. It'll make great architecture accessible to more people."— Stéphane Turbide
That's the future Stéphane sees, and it's already taking shape through initiatives like Maket's partnership with Lib Work in Japan. Not fewer architects, but architects working on better projects, spending less time on repetitive layout work and more on the deeply human parts of design that clients are willing to pay for.
The 80% problem most homeowners don't know about
About 80% of people who search online for "how to make a house plan" end up on plan-selling websites. They buy something inexpensive, but when they start customizing, fees skyrocket.
The money isn't saved at the first step (buying a generic plan). It's saved in the experience itself: using AI tools to explore and personalize from the start, rather than trying to retrofit a template that was never designed for your specific needs, lot, or budget.
Tools like Maket let homeowners, contractors, and architects generate personalized layouts based on real constraints, so the first design is already tailored to the project. No template. No surprise customization fees. If you're planning a home project and want to see what AI can do before committing to anything, try Maket free and generate your first layout in minutes.
Conclusion
The future of home design isn't about choosing between AI and architects. It's a new process where AI handles constraint management, rapid exploration, and early stage layouts, while architects focus on the creative, emotional, and deeply personal work that makes a home feel like more than just a building.
For homeowners and builders, this means better design at lower cost, with faster timelines and more options to explore before committing. For architects, it means the opportunity to do more meaningful work and reach more clients without sacrificing quality.
The home design process has always been slow, expensive, and opaque. That's what's changing. And the people who will shape that future are the ones already building with both: professional expertise and AI.
FAQs
Will AI completely replace architects?
No. AI is expected to handle 60 to 80% of the design process (constraint checking, layout generation, rapid iteration), but the final 20% requires human judgment. For the biggest investment of most people's lives, a professional architect's review and creative input remain essential, especially for complex or site-specific projects.
Can AI understand building codes and zoning regulations?
AI tools can hold dozens of regulatory constraints simultaneously and flag violations in real time (for example, exceeding a setback margin). However, building codes vary by municipality, province, and country, so AI works best as a real-time compliance checker alongside professional oversight, not as a standalone legal authority.
Is using AI for home design cheaper than hiring an architect?
Architect fees for residential projects are relatively small (typically $3,000 to $4,000 on a $600,000 project). AI's biggest cost savings come from reducing iteration cycles, cutting rendering costs by over 90%, and avoiding expensive mid-project changes. The combination of AI tools and professional review is often the most cost-effective approach. Maket offers a free trial to explore AI-generated layouts before committing to a full project.
How does AI handle personal preferences in home design?
AI processes client inputs (room count, style preferences, views, budget) alongside technical constraints and generates multiple layout options in minutes. This lets homeowners and architects explore several directions in a single session rather than waiting weeks for one draft. The result is a design conversation grounded in real options, not abstract descriptions.
Can AI create spaces that feel emotionally compelling?
Early AI tools placed rooms without considering how a space would feel to walk through. Modern AI understands circulation, spatial hierarchy, and design flow. It can organize layouts so impressive spaces take center stage while functional rooms are tucked efficiently. That said, the most nuanced emotional design decisions (orienting a kitchen to see guests arriving, for example) still benefit from an architect's instinct.
Do I still need an architect if I use AI tools?
It depends on the project. For straightforward builds where the goal is simply a functional home, AI tools and architectural technologists may be sufficient. For projects where design quality, site connection, and personal expression matter, an architect still adds significant value. AI makes both paths more accessible and affordable.